However, he's right to question where Soros is coming from. "Talking his book," most likely, in the hope of making a billion or two should a political crisis in America lead to a financial disjunction.

What Soros appears to be doing is drawing attention to the obvious implication of events in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon; namely, that Bush and his imperialist running dogs, Blair and Harper, are totally incompetent, and that the determination with which they pursue policies that yield results diametrically opposed to their stated objective; namely, of bringing freedom, democracy and prosperity to the people of the Islamic world, appears to show stupidity on a heroic scale.

But if, notwithstanding appearances and the assertions of George Soros, the United States government is not run by dunderheads and buffoons, one must conclude that chaos, impoverishment and civil war in the Muslim world and the creation of a host of new jihadists, far from being unintended consequences, are precisely the objectives of U.S. policy.

The logic of such a policy will not be intuitively obvious to those brought up to believe that we in the West are the bearers of the torch of liberty and justice, serving to light the path of the world. But considered as a purely practical matter, what possible reason could there be for promoting Islamic prosperity?

Muslims do not hold the West in great respect. As the Pope, with a brutal lack of tact recently pointed out, Mohammad and his followers see us as decadent infidels headed for an eternity of hell-fire. What is more, Muslims are numerous and highly philoprogenitive. Given education and good government, they would soon become rich and powerful and would increasingly challenge us in the competition for resources and military pre-eminence. Much better then, to do whatever is necessary to keep the poor and ignorant, in which condition they need concern us little.

So while it is tempting to condemn the United States for a war that is not only inflicting suffering on countless innocents but also destined for total failure, it would be more realistic to recognize that the United States and its allies are very successfully inflicting widespread suffering on innocents as a matter of deliberate self-serving policy. To impoverish, disrupt and dislocate the Muslim world is precisely the point of the "War on Terror" and if it generates a few extremists and terrorists, so much the better to justify the war with the people back home.

But there is a broader context to the "War on Terror": globalization. Muslims don't integrate, which creates a serious impediment to globalization, the objective of which is the maximization of profit to the owners of capital. The most direct route to profit maximization is the elimination of barriers to the movement of capital, goods and people. Take the factories where labor is cheapest and sell the goods where incomes are highest. So far as you need labor where incomes are high, drive down wages by transporting cheap labor from poor countries to compete with indiginous labor.

Muslims comprise a vast cheap labor resource, and millions of them have already moved to the West to compete with the local work force. But because they don't integrate, they create a distinct society within the host nation. This is seriously disruptive, not least because they continue in their philoprogenitive ways: successful males often having multiple subordinate wives or concubines whose primary role is reproductive. As French women disport themselves naked on the south coast beaches, Muslim women in the villages of the French hinterland, clothed to the eyeballs, raise kids.

This is not the idea at all. Girls are supposed to get an education -- it's the most effective birth control. You know, can't have kids till you've finished school, can't have kids till you've paid off the student loan, can't have kids till you've got established in your profession. And then, can't have kids, period. But when such women come to the end of their useful lives, they can be replaced by new cheap labor from elsewhere. This is much more economical than letting people raise kids who'll require maternity hospitals, paediatricians, schools, universities, and for many that don't make the grade academically, welfare, police and prisons.

But those darned Muslims understand the laws of natural selection. They understand biology. They understand that if they breed and westerners do not, they will inherit the west. Already they account for a third of the population in the Netherlands, and 10% of the French population. In Britain, it is expected that by the year 2020 there will be more people attending mosques than attending services of the Anglican church (Prop. Queen Elizabeth II).

What to do? Demonize Islam. Call the devout Islamo-fascists or Islamo-Nazis. You can come to Britain, Canada, wherever you like, provided you forget your Muslims identity and culture. If you are to live in the West, you must become unbelievers like us. Hedonists, driven hither and thither as the advertising industry and the media propaganda machine dictates in the interests of capital.

Thus, globalization, destruction of the nation state and the human nations they represent, elimination of religion as a factor shaping human thought, behaviour and institutions, these are the goals of the War on Terror. Will it work? Most likely. What could prevent it from working? Only if we in the West chose not to be treated as the West is now treating Muslims. We, just as much as Muslims, are fodder for the globalists mill. Our nations are being destroyed even more rapidly than the Islamic nations. No western country is fully capable of self-reproduction. Some nations, Germany and Italy in particular, face demographic collapse. Our culture is under attack. Free speech, habeus corpus, the right to take pride in our race and traditions have been denied.

Who, it is interesting to consider in this context, are the real Fascists? According to Mussolini, the inventor of modern Fascism, the people are a creation of the state. An odious doctrine, surely, that has attained its fullest flowering under Tony Blair's police state, with its ubiquitous surveillance cameras, its nanny state intervention into almost every aspect of personal life, culminating in Blair's current plan for eugenocide of the yobs. Hitler, by contrast, held, if he did not practice, the seemingly more attractive theory that the state was the embodiment of the people's will, i.e., a notion totally opposed to Fascism. Thus, the current fad in the corpo. media of demonizing Muslims as both Fascists and Nazis demonstrates the imbecility of the underlying process of thought. Muslims, on the other hand, believe that life should be ordered by a transcendant code ordained by God: what Westerners believed before the Corpo. media and entertainment industry trashed Christianity and turned it into an adjunct of George Bush's war propanda machine.

So here's your choice, quit wasting your time reading blogs or writing them. Get with the program. Focus on one thing. Get as much money as you can. That's the only measure of a man under the New World Order (for a woman big boobs also count). Or you can become a real citizen of a democratic state. Work for the impeachment of Bush. Never relent in the ridicule of Harper. Piss on Blair. Find out what is happening, and work for something better.

Permanent Link