WHEN ANTI-RACISM MEANS SELF-DESTRUCTION

BBC appoints Muslim head of religious programming

In Britain, which is steadily being colonised by mass immigration from Muslim countries, the British Broadcasting Corporation has appointed Mr Aaqil Ahmed its first Muslim head of religious programming.

...More than half of all births in some towns and cities, including London (54%), Slough (56%) and Luton (51%), were to non-UK born mothers. This figure peaks at 75 percent in the London borough of Newham.

The ONS population report states that, on average, 'foreign' women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women.

The number of babies born to British mothers is also rising, but lags far behind immigrants at an average of 1.7 children each. From this it is possible to deduce that white British mothers are only producing 1.5 children at a maximum, against a required replacement level of 2.1.

The ONS has also predicted that the British population could reach 71 million by 2031, with migrants and their UK-born children accounting for 70 percent of that growth.

Given that England has a state church, which is at least nominally Christian, it seems bizarre that the state broadcaster would place religious programming in the hands of a Muslim. But if autogenocide, both cultural and biological is the goal of UK national policy, then this would make entirely good sense.

In this connection, Craig Murray states that the British National Party, which posted the above article, is racist. Can that be inferred from the paragraphs reproduced above, and if so, is this kind of racism a bad thing?

As I understand it, the point of these statements is to indicate the probability that the English nation will, in large part, be replaced within a generation by Asian immigrants and their descendants. To be concerned about that may be a form of racism, but if so, is it bad? In my view, it is not. It is one thing to hate, say, Pakistanis or Poles, it is another thing altogether to oppose allowing the English nation to be submerged by a Pakistani or Polish immigrant wave.

Possibly, Craig Murray, who is on record as condemning both Nu Labor and the British Conservative party for the their crass corruptionism and much else, is preparing to run for Parliament as a Lib-Dem, in which case he has to regurgitate the Lib-Dem self-hating policy on the destruction of the English race, however stupid that may be and however crassly corrupt the Lib-Dems may be.

Not that Murray is English. He's another damned Scot (I say that in the assumption that among the English (or their derivatives in this author's case), Scots, Welsh and Irish, a degree of amiable racism is still permissible, since they're all useless white people anyway) who, like the despicable Blair and Brown before him, never saw a fairer prospect than the broad high road to London. So his readiness to see England self-destruct is understandable, although how it will help the Scots, whose narrow nationalism (aka racism) was remarked by that brilliantly upward mobile, England-dwelling son-of-the-Kirk, John Buchan, to replace 50 million English south of the border with 80 million mostly Asians is far from obvious.

Home page